Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/80327

TítuloBenefits and risks of sharing genomic data for research: comparing the views of rare disease patients, informal carers and healthcare professionals
Autor(es)Amorim, Mariana
Silva, Susana
Machado, Helena
Teles, Elisa Leão
Baptista, Maria João
Maia, Tiago
Nwebonyi, Ngozi
de Freitas, Cláudia
Palavras-chaverare diseases
data sharing
genomics research
risks
data governance
public views
Data19-Jul-2022
EditoraMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
RevistaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
CitaçãoAmorim, M.; Silva, S.; Machado, H.; Teles, E.L.; Baptista, M.J.; Maia, T.; Nwebonyi, N.; de Freitas, C. Benefits and Risks of Sharing Genomic Data for Research: Comparing the Views of Rare Disease Patients, Informal Carers and Healthcare Professionals. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 8788. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148788
Resumo(s)Assessing public and patients’ expectations and concerns about genomic data sharing is essential to promote adequate data governance and engagement in rare diseases genomics research. This cross-sectional study compared the views of 159 rare disease patients, 478 informal carers and 63 healthcare professionals in Northern Portugal about the benefits and risks of sharing genomic data for research, and its associated factors. The three participant groups expressed significantly different views. The majority of patients (84.3%) and informal carers (87.4%) selected the discovery of a cure for untreatable diseases as the most important benefit. In contrast, most healthcare professionals revealed a preference for the development of new drugs and treatments (71.4%), which was the second most selected benefit by carers (48.3%), especially by the more educated (OR (95% CI): 1.58 (1.07–2.34)). Lack of security and control over information access and the extraction of information exceeding research objectives were the two most often selected risks by patients (72.6% and 50.3%, respectively) and carers (60.0% and 60.6%, respectively). Conversely, professionals were concerned with genomic data being used to discriminate citizens (68.3%), followed by the extraction of information exceeding research objectives (54.0%). The latter risk was more frequently expressed by more educated carers (OR (95% CI): 1.60 (1.06–2.41)) and less by those with blue-collar (OR (95% CI): 0.44 (0.25–0.77) and other occupations (OR (95% CI): 0.44 (0.26–0.74)). Developing communication strategies and consent approaches tailored to participants’ expectations and needs can benefit the inclusiveness of genomics research that is key for patient-centred care.
TipoArtigo
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/80327
DOI10.3390/ijerph19148788
ISSN1661-7827
e-ISSN1660-4601
Versão da editorahttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8788
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoAcesso aberto
Aparece nas coleções:CECS - Artigos em revistas internacionais / Articles in international journals

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
ijerph-19-08788-v3.pdf403,1 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID