Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/74233

TítuloAnalysis of the learning process through eye tracking technology and feature selection techniques
Autor(es)Sáiz-Manzanares, María Consuelo
Pérez, Ismael Ramos
Rodríguez, Adrián Arnaiz
Arribas, Sandra Rodríguez
Almeida, Leandro
Martin, Caroline Françoise
Palavras-chavemachine learning
cognition
eye tracking
instance selection
clustering
information processing
DataJul-2021
EditoraMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
RevistaApplied Sciences
CitaçãoSáiz-Manzanares, M.C.; Pérez, I.R.; Rodríguez, A.A.; Arribas, S.R.; Almeida, L.; Martin, C.F. Analysis of the Learning Process through Eye Tracking Technology and Feature Selection Techniques. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6157. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11136157
Resumo(s)In recent decades, the use of technological resources such as the eye tracking methodology is providing cognitive researchers with important tools to better understand the learning process. However, the interpretation of the metrics requires the use of supervised and unsupervised learning techniques. The main goal of this study was to analyse the results obtained with the eye tracking methodology by applying statistical tests and supervised and unsupervised machine learning techniques, and to contrast the effectiveness of each one. The parameters of fixations, saccades, blinks and scan path, and the results in a puzzle task were found. The statistical study concluded that no significant differences were found between participants in solving the crossword puzzle task; significant differences were only detected in the parameters saccade amplitude minimum and saccade velocity minimum. On the other hand, this study, with supervised machine learning techniques, provided possible features for analysis, some of them different from those used in the statistical study. Regarding the clustering techniques, a good fit was found between the algorithms used (<i>k-</i>means ++, fuzzy <i>k-</i>means and DBSCAN). These algorithms provided the learning profile of the participants in three types (students over 50 years old; and students and teachers under 50 years of age). Therefore, the use of both types of data analysis is considered complementary.
TipoArtigo
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/74233
DOI10.3390/app11136157
e-ISSN2076-3417
Versão da editorahttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/13/6157
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoAcesso aberto
Aparece nas coleções:BUM - MDPI

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
applsci-11-06157-v2.pdf3,9 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID