Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/72882

TítuloArtificial substrates as sampling devices for marine epibenthic fauna: A quest for standardization
Autor(es)Carreira-Flores, Diego
Neto, Regina
Ferreira, Hugo
Cabecinha, Edna
Diaz-Agras, Guillermo
Gomes, Pedro T.
Palavras-chaveEpifaunal assemblages
Macroalgae
Artificial Seaweed Monitoring Structures
Cystoseira baccata
Halidrys siliquosa
Data2020
EditoraElsevier 1
RevistaRegional Studies in Marine Science
CitaçãoCarreira-Flores, D., Neto, R., Ferreira, H., Cabecinha, E., Díaz-Agras, G., & Gomes, P. T. (2020). Artificial substrates as sampling devices for marine epibenthic fauna: A quest for standardization. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 37, 101331. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2020.101331
Resumo(s)In temperate regions, macroalgae are naturally abundant habitat builders for many organisms of ecological and economic importance. Hence, macroalgae are good targets for monitoring studies based on colonization processes as, through them, it is possible to sample the epifauna that uses them as habitat. Nevertheless, macroalgae collection may not be sustainable, can compromise the survival of the target macroalgae populations and destroy fragile or threatened communities.The search for an adequate procedure that can overcome the problems related to destructive quantitative sampling of the epifauna associated with macroalgae and the development of a methodology that can be used for comparative macrofauna monitoring, regardless of the location, were the motivations for this study. The evaluation of the mobile epifauna associated with Artificial Substrates (AS) with different degrees of complexity and natural subtidal macroalgae was implemented, as a means to evaluate the viability of AS as an alternative approach for epifauna monitoring.Cystoseira baccata and Halidrys siliquosa were chosen as natural macroalgae. The hypotheses tested were (1) macroalgae and AS with similar structure will support similar assemblages of mobile epifauna; (2) different complexity AS will shelter different assemblages of mobile epifauna. The results obtained after 3 and 6 months showed that AS and macroalgae, both with similar structure, supported different assemblages of mobile epifauna, differing also when the time factor is considered. Moreover, different complexity AS supported different epifaunal assemblages. Our results also show that a period of colonization of 3 months was enough to accurately discriminate locations but the 3 additional months reinforce these differences and provide more coherent results with the species colonizing natural macroalgae in both locations studied. Hence, AS could be used as a valid, replicable, standard and representative alternative tool for monitoring studies.
TipoArtigo
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/72882
DOI10.1016/j.rsma.2020.101331
ISSN2352-4855
Versão da editorahttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235248552030459X
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoAcesso aberto
Aparece nas coleções:CBMA - Artigos/Papers

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
1-s2.0-S235248552030459X-main.pdf1,13 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID