Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/60589

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorAzevedo, Andreia S.por
dc.contributor.authorSousa, Inês M.por
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, R.por
dc.contributor.authorAzevedo, Nuno F.por
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, Carinapor
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-19T13:14:32Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-19T13:14:32Z-
dc.date.issued2019-05-31-
dc.identifier.citationAzevedo, Andreia S.; Sousa, Inês M.; Fernandes, R.; Azevedo, Nuno F.; Almeida, Carina, Optimizing locked nucleic acid/2-O-methyl-RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (LNA/2OMe-FISH) procedure for bacterial detection. PLoS One, 14(5), e0217689, 2019por
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/60589-
dc.description.abstractDespite the successful application of LNA/2OMe-FISH procedures for bacteria detection, there is a lack of knowledge on the properties that affect hybridization. Such information is crucial for the rational design of protocols. Hence, this work aimed to evaluate the effect of three essential factors on the LNA/2OMe hybridization stephybridization temperature, NaCl concentration and type and concentration of denaturant (formamide, ethylene carbonate and urea). This optimization was performed for 3 Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Citrobacter freundii) and 2 Gram-positive bacteria (Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus epidermidis), employing the response surface methodology and a Eubacteria probe. In general, it was observed that a high NaCl concentration is beneficial (from 2 M to 5 M), regardless of the denaturant used. Urea, formamide and ethylene carbonate are suitable denaturants for LNA/2OMe-FISH applications; but urea provides higher fluorescence intensities among the different bacteria, especially for gram-positive bacteria and for P. aeruginosa. However, a unique optimal protocol was not found for all tested bacteria. Despite this, the results indicate that a hybridization solution with 2 M of urea and 4 M of NaCl would be a proper starting point. Furthermore, a hybridization temperature around 62°C, for 14 bp probes with LNA monomers at every third position of 2?OMe and 64% of GC content, should be use in initial optimization of new LNA/2OMe-FISH protocols.por
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was financially supportedby project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006939 (Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy – UID/EQU/00511/2013),POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006684 (Center of Biological Engineering - UID/BIO/04469) funded by EuropeanRegional Development Fund (ERDF) through COMPETE2020– Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI), and by national funds (PIDDAC) through FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia/MCTES; NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000004- BioTecNorte operation,funded by the EuropeanRegional Development Fund under the scope of Norte2020 Programa Operacional Regional do Norte; PostDoctoral Fellowship SFRH/BPD/121601/2016 (Andreia S. Azevedo) and PhD Fellowship SFRH/ BD/118860/2016 (Ricardo M. Fernandes) supportedby national funds throughFCT Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Project PTDC/DTP-PIC/4562/2014 – POCI-01-0145FEDER-016678 (Coded-FISH) and Project POCI01-0145-FEDER-030431(CLASInVivo), funded by FEDER funds through COMPETE2020- Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI) and by national funds through FCT Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherPublic Library of Sciencepor
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147284/PTpor
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147337/PTpor
dc.relationSFRH/BPD/121601/2016por
dc.relationSFRH/BD/118860/2016por
dc.relationPTDC/DTP-PIC/4562/2014por
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.titleOptimizing locked nucleic acid/2-O-methyl-RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (LNA/2OMe-FISH) procedure for bacterial detectionpor
dc.typearticle-
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://journals.plos.org/plosone/por
dc.commentsCEB51744por
oaire.citationStartPagee0217689por
oaire.citationIssue5por
oaire.citationConferencePlaceUnited States-
oaire.citationVolume14por
dc.date.updated2019-06-01T11:27:30Z-
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203por
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0217689por
dc.identifier.pmid31150460por
dc.description.publicationversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpor
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.journalPLoS ONEpor
Aparece nas coleções:CEB - Publicações em Revistas/Séries Internacionais / Publications in International Journals/Series

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
document_51744_1.pdf1,75 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID