Determinants on an efficient cellulase recycling process for the production of bioethanol from recycled paper sludge under high solid loadings

Abstract

Background: In spite of the continuous efforts and investments in the last decades, lignocellulosic ethanol is still not economically competitive with fossil fuels. Optimization is still required in different parts of the process. Namely, the cost effective usage of enzymes has been pursued by different strategies, one of them being recycling. Results: Cellulase recycling was analyzed on Recycled Paper Sludge (RPS) conversion into bioethanol under intensified conditions. Different cocktails were studied regarding thermostability, hydrolysis efficiency, distribution in the multiphasic system and recovery from solid. Celluclast showed inferior stability at higher temperatures (45-55 ºC), nevertheless its performance at moderate temperatures (40ºC) was slightly superior to other cocktails (ACCELLERASE®1500 and Cellic®CTec2). Celluclast distribution in the solid-liquid medium was also more favorable, enabling to recover 88 % of final activity at the end of the process. A Central Composite Design studied the influence of solids concentration and enzyme dosage on RPS conversion by Celluclast. Solids concentration showed a significant positive effect on glucose production, no major limitations being found from utilizing high amounts of solids under the studied conditions. Increasing enzyme loading from 20 to 30 FPU/ gcellulose had no significant effect on sugars production, suggesting that 22 % solids and 20 FPU/gcellulose are the best operational conditions towards an intensified process. Applying these, a system of multiple rounds of hydrolysis with enzyme recycling was implemented, allowing to maintain steady levels of enzyme activity with only 50 % of enzyme on each recycling stage. Additionally, interesting levels of solid conversion (70-81 %) were also achieved, leading to considerable improvements on glucose and ethanol production comparatively with the reports available so far (3.4 and 3.8 fold, respectively). Conclusions: Enzyme recycling viability depends on enzyme distribution between the solid and liquid phases at the end of hydrolysis, as well as enzymes thermostability. Both are critical features to be observed for a judicious choice of enzyme cocktail. This work demonstrates that enzyme recycling in intensified biomass degradation can be achieved through simple means. The process is possibly much more effective at larger scale, hence novel enzyme formulations favoring this possibility should be developed for industrial usage.