Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/51840

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorPaulo, Rui Miguel Medeirospor
dc.contributor.authorAlbuquerque, Pedro Barbaspor
dc.contributor.authorVitorino, Fabiana Cristina Salvadorpor
dc.contributor.authorBull, Raypor
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-08T15:20:56Z-
dc.date.issued2017-07-
dc.identifier.issn1068-316Xpor
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/51840-
dc.description.abstractThe Cognitive Interview (CI) is one of the most widely studied and used methods to interview witnesses. However, new component techniques for further increasing correct recall are still crucial. We focused on how a new and simpler interview strategy, Category Clustering Recall (CCR), could increase recall in comparison with witness-compatible questioning and tested if a Revised Cognitive Interview (RCI) with CCR instead of witness-compatible questioning and without the change order and change perspective mnemonics would be effective for this purpose. Participants watched a mock robbery video and were interviewed 48 hours later with either the CI or the RCI. Recalled information was classified as either correct, incorrect or confabulation. Although exclusion of the change order and change perspective mnemonics in the RCI group might have caused a slight decrease in recall during the last interview phases, the RCI group generally produced more correct information than the CI group, with a lower number of confabulations. Further analyses revealed CCR was largely responsible for this increase in correct recall. CCR is a very promising interview technique which allowed the interviewer to obtain more detailed information without additional questions and may have, in certain situations, several practical advantages over a questioning phase.por
dc.description.sponsorship- This work was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology under Grant number SFRH/BD/84817/2012. This study was conducted at the Psychology Research Centre (UID/PSI/01662/2013), University of Minho, and also supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology and the Portuguese Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education through national funds and co-financed by FEDER through COMPETE2020 under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007653).por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherRoutledgepor
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH%2FBD%2F84817%2F2012/PTpor
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147227/PTpor
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspor
dc.subjectCognitive interviewpor
dc.subjectCategory clustering recallpor
dc.subjectWitness-compatible questioningpor
dc.subjectChange orderpor
dc.subjectChange perspectivepor
dc.titleEnhancing the cognitive interview with an alternative procedure to witness-compatible questioning: category clustering recallpor
dc.typearticle-
dc.peerreviewedyespor
oaire.citationStartPage967por
oaire.citationEndPage982por
oaire.citationIssue10por
oaire.citationVolume23por
dc.date.updated2018-02-21T13:55:19Z-
dc.identifier.eissn1477-2744por
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/1068316X.2017.1351966por
dc.description.publicationversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpor
dc.subject.wosSocial Sciences-
sdum.export.identifier2853-
sdum.journalPsychology Crime & Lawpor
Aparece nas coleções:CIPsi - Artigos (Papers)

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
17 PAULO, ALBUQUERQUE, VITORINO & BULL (2017) - PSYCHOLOGY, CRIME AND LAW.pdf
Acesso restrito!
1,31 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID