Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/49991

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Célio Bruno Pintopor
dc.contributor.authorAraujo, M. S. B.por
dc.contributor.authorFerrás, Luís Jorge Limapor
dc.contributor.authorMiguel Nóbrega, J.por
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-01T15:13:56Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-01T15:13:56Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.date.submitted2017-02-
dc.identifier.citationFernandes, C., Araujo, M. S. B., Ferrás, L. L., & Nóbrega, J. M. (2017). Improved both sides diffusion (iBSD): A new and straightforward stabilization approach for viscoelastic fluid flows. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 249, 63-78por
dc.identifier.issn0377-0257por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/49991-
dc.description.abstractThis paper reports the developments made to improve the numerical stability of the open-source finite-volume computational library OpenFOAM (R) developed for the numerical computation of viscoelastic fluid flows described by differential constitutive models. The improvements are based on the modification of the both-sides diffusion technique, named improved both-sides diffusion (iBSD), which promotes the coupling between velocity and stress fields. Calculations for two benchmark 2D case studies of an upper-convected Maxwell (UCM) fluid are presented and compared with literature results, namely the 4:1 planar contraction flow and the flow around a confined cylinder. The results obtained for the first case are computed in five meshes with different refinement levels and are compared with literature results. In this case study it was possible to achieve steady-state converged solutions in the range of Deborah numbers tested, De = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5}, for all meshes. The corner vortex size predictions agree well with the literature and a relative error below 0.6% is obtained for De <= 5. In the flow around a confined cylinder, steady-state converged solutions were obtained in the range of Deborah numbers tested, De = {0, 0.3, 0.6, 0.8), in four consecutively refined meshes. The predictions of the drag coefficient on the cylinder are similar to reference data with a relative error below 0.08%. For both test cases the developed numerical method was shown to have a convergence order between 1 and 2, in general very close to the latter. Moreover, the results presented for both case studies clearly extend the previous ones available in the literature in terms of accuracy. This was a direct consequence of the capability of performing the calculation with more refined meshes, than the ones employed before.por
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work is funded by FEDER funds through the COMPETE 2020 Programme and National Funds through FCT - Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology under the project UID/CTM/50025/2013 and under the scholarship SFRH/BPD/100353/2014. The author M.S.B. Araujo acknowledges funding from CAPES (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior) proc. BEX 1902-14-8. The authors would like to acknowledge the Minho University cluster under the project Search-ON2: Revitalization of HPC infrastructure of UMinho, (NORTE-07-0162-FEDER-000086), co-funded by the North Portugal Regional Operational Programme (ON.2-0 Novo Norte), under the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF), through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). The authors thank Professor M.A. Alves and F. Pimenta from University of Porto for insightful comments regarding this work and availability of the deferred correction discretization schemes.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherElsevier Science BVpor
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147333/PT-
dc.relationSFRH/BPD/100353/2014-
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectOpenFOAMpor
dc.subjectUpper-convected Maxwell modelpor
dc.subjectSudden contraction flowpor
dc.subjectFlow around a cylinderpor
dc.titleImproved both sides diffusion (iBSD): A new and straightforward stabilization approach for viscoelastic fluid flowspor
dc.typearticle-
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377025717301003por
oaire.citationStartPage63por
oaire.citationEndPage78por
oaire.citationVolume249por
dc.date.updated2018-01-11T15:26:50Z-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-2631por
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jnnfm.2017.09.008por
dc.subject.fosCiências Médicas::Medicina Básicapor
dc.description.publicationversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpor
dc.subject.wosScience & Technology-
sdum.export.identifier2320-
sdum.journalJournal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanicspor
Aparece nas coleções:IPC - Artigos em revistas científicas internacionais com arbitragem

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
2017_JournalPaper_JNNFM_UCMDiferentialModel_Celio.pdf3,31 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID