Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/43571

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Matilde Alexandrapor
dc.contributor.authorLeão, Celina Pintopor
dc.contributor.authorNunes, Eusébio P.por
dc.contributor.authorSousa, Sérgiopor
dc.contributor.authorArezes, P.por
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-20T14:10:34Z-
dc.date.issued2016-03-
dc.identifier.issn2332-9017por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/43571-
dc.description.abstractOrganizations need to make decisions about risk acceptance, to decide about the need of risk-reducing measures. In this process, the personal judgments of occupational safety and health (OSH) practitioners have great importance. If on one hand, they have the technical knowledge about risk; on the other hand, the decisions can be dependent on their level of risk acceptance. This paper analyzes judgments of OSH practitioners about the level of risk acceptance, using the fuzzy logic approach. A questionnaire to analyze the reported level of risk acceptance was applied. The questionnaire included 79 risk scenarios, each accounting for the frequency of an accident with more lost workdays than a given magnitude. Through the two-step cluster analysis, three groups of OSH practitioners were identified: unacceptable, tolerable, and realistic groups. A further analysis of the realistic group judgments about risk was performed, using the fuzzy logic approach. The fuzzy sets of input and output variables were determined, and the relationship between the variables was mapped through fuzzy rules. After that, the min–max fuzzy inference method was used. The obtained results show that the risk level is acceptable when input variables are at the lowest value and unacceptable when the risk level is high. The obtained results allow us to better understand the modeling of OSH practitioners’ judgments about risk acceptance, noting the uncertainty related to these judgments.por
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors of this paper would like to express their acknowledgments to all OSH who accepted the challenge to participate in this study. This work has been supported by COMPETE: POCI-010145-FEDER-007043 and FCT-Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia within the Project Scope: UID/CEC/00319/2013.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)por
dc.relationPOCI-01-0145-315 FEDER-007043por
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147280/PTpor
dc.relationFCT Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologiapor
dc.rightsclosedAccesspor
dc.subjectFuzzy logicpor
dc.subjectAccidentspor
dc.subjectOccupational safety and healthpor
dc.subjectRiskpor
dc.subjectdecision-makingpor
dc.subjectfuzzy approachpor
dc.subjectrisk acceptancepor
dc.subjectoccupational accidentspor
dc.titleA fuzzy logic approach in the definition of risk acceptance boundaries in occupational safety and healthpor
dc.typearticle-
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://risk.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/mobile/article.aspx?articleID=2502720por
sdum.publicationstatusinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpor
oaire.citationIssue4por
oaire.citationTitleASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineeringpor
oaire.citationVolume2por
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4032923por
dc.subject.fosEngenharia e Tecnologia::Outras Engenharias e Tecnologiaspor
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.journalASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems. Part B: Mechanical Engineeringpor
Aparece nas coleções:LES/ALG - Artigos em revistas científicas internacionais com arbitragem

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
RISK-15-1031_AUTHOR_1_prof.pdf
Acesso restrito!
849,45 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID