Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/41403

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Ruipor
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Rita S.por
dc.contributor.authorPedro, Madureirapor
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, Carinapor
dc.contributor.authorAzevedo, Nuno F.por
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-03T10:13:58Z-
dc.date.available2016-05-03T10:13:58Z-
dc.date.issued2016-05-
dc.date.submitted2015-11-
dc.identifier.citationRocha, R.; Santos, Rita S.; Pedro, Madureira; Almeida, Carina; Azevedo, Nuno F., Optimization of peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization (PNA-FISH) for the detection of bacteria: the effect of pH, dextran sulfate and probe concentration. Journal of Biotechnology, 226, 1-7, 2016por
dc.identifier.issn0168-1656por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/41403-
dc.description.abstractFluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a molecular technique widely used for the detection and characterization of microbial populations. FISH is affected by a wide variety of abiotic and biotic variables and the way they interact with each other. This is translated into a wide variability of FISH procedures found in the literature. The aim of this work is to systematically study the effects of pH, dextran sulfate and probe concentration in the FISH protocol, using a general peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probe for the Eubacteria domain. For this, response surface methodology was used to optimize these 3 PNA-FISH parameters for Gram-negative (Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas fluorescens) and Gram-positive species (Listeria innocua, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Bacillus cereus). The obtained results show that a probe concentration higher than 300 nM is favorable for both groups. Interestingly, a clear distinction between the two groups regarding the optimal pH and dextran sulfate concentration was found: a high pH (approx. 10), combined with lower dextran sulfate concentration (approx. 2% [w/v]) for Gram-negative species and near-neutral pH (approx. 8), together with higher dextran sulfate concentrations (approx. 10% [w/v]) for Gram-positive species. This behavior seems to result from an interplay between pH and dextran sulfate and their ability to influence probe concentration and diffusion towards the rRNA target. This study shows that, for an optimum hybridization protocol, dextran sulfate and pH should be adjusted according to the target bacteria.por
dc.description.sponsorshipFCT/MEC with national funds and when applicable co-funded by FEDER in the scope of the P2020 Partnership Agreement [Project UID/EQU/00511/2013-LEPABE]; FEDER funds through the Operational Programme for Competitiveness Factors - COMPETE, O Novo Norte-North Portugal Regional Operational Programme - ON2 and National Funds through Foundation for Science and Technology-FCT [Project NORTE-07-0124FEDER-000025-RL2_Environment & Health, Project ‘DNA mimics’ PIC/IC/82815/2007 and Project ‘NanoDiaBac’ ENMed/0003/2014]; PhD fellowships [SFRH/BDE/51910/2012 and SFRH/BD/84376/2012] and Postdoctoral fellowships [SFRH/BPD/88137/2012 and SFRH/BPD/74480/2010]por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.por
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/3599-PPCDT/138727/PTpor
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5646-ICCMS/82815/PTpor
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH%2FBDE%2F51910%2F2012/PTpor
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH%2FBD%2F84376%2F2012/PTpor
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH%2FBPD%2F88137%2F2012/PTpor
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/SFRH/SFRH%2FBPD%2F74480%2F2010/PTpor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectPNA-FISHpor
dc.subjectEubacteriapor
dc.subjectDextran sulfatepor
dc.subjectpHpor
dc.subjectPNA EUB338por
dc.titleOptimization of peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization (PNA-FISH) for the detection of bacteria: the effect of pH, dextran sulfate and probe concentrationpor
dc.typearticle-
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168165616301638por
dc.commentsCEB37865por
sdum.publicationstatusinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpor
oaire.citationStartPage1por
oaire.citationEndPage7por
oaire.citationConferencePlaceNetherlands-
oaire.citationTitleJournal of Biotechnologypor
oaire.citationVolume226por
dc.date.updated2016-04-05T18:14:50Z-
dc.identifier.eissn0168-1656-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.03.047por
dc.identifier.pmid27021959por
dc.subject.fosEngenharia e Tecnologia::Biotecnologia Industrialpor
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.journalJournal of Biotechnologypor
Aparece nas coleções:CEB - Publicações em Revistas/Séries Internacionais / Publications in International Journals/Series

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
document_37865_1.pdf1,95 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID