Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/31304

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorMorais, Pedropor
dc.contributor.authorRufino, Marta M.por
dc.contributor.authorReis, Joaquimpor
dc.contributor.authorDias, Esterpor
dc.contributor.authorSousa, Ronaldo Gomespor
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-25T14:59:11Z-
dc.date.available2014-11-25T14:59:11Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn0260-1230por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/31304-
dc.description.abstractThe morphological variability of freshwater bivalve species, observed between and within river basins, may hamper their correct identification, even by experienced researchers. Classic morphometric measurements, i.e. shell length, height and thickness, or their ratios, are generally insufficient to distinguish populations and/or species. These issues may be overcome using a geometric morphometric method, which allows analysis of the overall shape of the individual, independently of its size. Thus, we aimed to test the usefulness of two geometric morphometric tools, landmarks and sliding semilandmarks, to evaluate the morphological variability of Unio delphinus Spengler, 1783 in three habitats of the Guadiana Basin (SW Iberian Peninsula, Europe): estuary, river and stream. We used 13 landmarks located on the shell interior (at the teeth, muscle scars and pallial line) and 35 sliding semilandmarks for the shell contour. These morphometric analyses showed that the shell shape of U. delphinus differs significantly among different habitats. Estuarine and stream shells are the most disparate (James index ¼ 649.114, permutation P-value ,0.001) and variability is not related to variations in shell size. The main differences in shell morphology are the following: (1) estuarine shells are more elongate, while riverine shells are more subovate; (2) the anterior curvature at the umbo is steeper in estuarine and riverine shells; (3) estuarine shells have an arched curvature at the ventral part of the shell, which is absent in specimens from the other habitats. Our data suggest that the morphology of U. delphinus shells might be influenced by the water flow characteristics of each habitat, since shells exhibited characteristics that are typically observed in freshwater mussels from lotic and lentic habitatspor
dc.description.sponsorshipWe acknowledge the valuable comments and suggestions made by Daniel L. Graf, Simon Schneider and an anonymous reviewer on an earlier version of the manuscript. We are also grateful to John Babaluk for his comments and for improving the grammar and style of the manuscript. P.M. and M.M.R. are supported by Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia through a postdoctoral scholarship (SFRH/BPD/40832/2007) and 'Ciencia 2008' contract, respectively.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherOxford University Presspor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.titleAssessing the morphological variability of Unio Delphinus spengler, 1783 (bivalvia : unionidae) using geometric morphometrypor
dc.typearticlepor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
oaire.citationStartPage17por
oaire.citationEndPage23por
oaire.citationIssue1por
oaire.citationTitleJournal of Molluscan Studiespor
oaire.citationVolume80por
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/mollus/eyt037por
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.journalJournal of Molluscan Studiespor
Aparece nas coleções:DBio - Artigos/Papers

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Morais et al. 2014.pdf376,95 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID