Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo:
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/2929
Registo completo
Campo DC | Valor | Idioma |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Mendes, Silvia M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | McDonald, Michael D. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2005-09-15T14:37:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2005-09-15T14:37:22Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | "Policy studies journal". ISSN 0190-292X. 29:4 (2001) 588-610. | eng |
dc.identifier.issn | 0190-292X | eng |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1822/2929 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Studies of criminal deterrence usually show an effect of certainty of punishment but often fail to find an effect of severity. This is a serious threat to the theoretical underpinnings of deterrence theory. Through both a survey of 39 analyses in 33 published studies and our own reanalysis of an often-used data set, we show the problem rests not with the theory but with the analysis of the theory. Finding no severity effect can be traced to â unbundling the theoretical packageâ when moving from the theory to the statistical models used to represent the theory. | eng |
dc.language.iso | eng | eng |
dc.publisher | Policy Studies Organization | por |
dc.rights | openAccess | eng |
dc.subject | Dissuação criminal | eng |
dc.title | Putting severity of punishment back in the deterrence package | eng |
dc.type | article | por |
dc.peerreviewed | yes | eng |
sdum.number | 4 | eng |
sdum.pagination | 588-610 | eng |
sdum.publicationstatus | published | eng |
sdum.volume | 29 | eng |
oaire.citationStartPage | 588 | por |
oaire.citationEndPage | 610 | por |
oaire.citationIssue | 4 | por |
oaire.citationVolume | 29 | por |
dc.subject.wos | Social Sciences | por |
sdum.journal | Policy studies journal | por |
Aparece nas coleções: | NEAPP - Publicações em Revistas Internacionais |
Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro | Descrição | Tamanho | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GlasgowPSJ.pdf | 803,22 kB | Adobe PDF | Ver/Abrir |