Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo:
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/11494
Título: | Comparison of in situ performance-based tests methods to evaluate moduli of railway embankments |
Autor(es): | Correia, A. Gomes Martins, João Paulo Caldeira, Laura Neves, E. Maranha das Delgado, João L. C. |
Palavras-chave: | Compaction Performance-based tests Static plate load test Dynamic plate load test Soil stiffness gauge Portancemètre |
Data: | 2009 |
Editora: | Taylor & Francis |
Citação: | TUTUMLUER, Erol ; AL-QADI, Imad L., eds. – “Bearing capacity of roads, railways and airfields : proceedings of the 8th Internacional Conference on the Bearing Capacity …, Illinois, USA, 2009”. London : Taylor & Francis, cop. 2009. ISBN 978-0-415-87199-0. p. 1331-1340. |
Resumo(s): | Compaction control based on performance-based test methods has been used recently. These test methods use different load and strain rates as well as boundary conditions requiring the need of calibration and correlation between them. In this paper, correlations are established between the small strain modulus Ev measured from different “in situ” per-formed-based test methods carried on a trial embankment. The Ev modulus was obtained from spot tests, namely, static plate loading test (SPLT), light falling weight deflectometer (LFWD), soil stiffness gauge (SSG), and a continuous test with “Portancemètre” equipment. The SPLT was used as a reference test. The paper describes the experimental plan, presents the theory for each test method, and gives the results and established correlations. |
Tipo: | Artigo em ata de conferência |
URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/1822/11494 |
ISBN: | 978-0-415-87199-0 |
Arbitragem científica: | yes |
Acesso: | Acesso restrito UMinho |
Aparece nas coleções: | C-TAC - Comunicações a Conferências Internacionais |
Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro | Descrição | Tamanho | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BRC2A.pdf Acesso restrito! | Livro | 593,77 kB | Adobe PDF | Ver/Abrir |
Comparison of in situ performance-based tests methods.pdf Acesso restrito! | Artigo | 322,66 kB | Adobe PDF | Ver/Abrir |